1954 Citroen Traction vs. 1968 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1968 Lotus Elan is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Citroen Traction. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Citroen Traction would be higher. At 2,866 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Citroen Traction is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Lotus Elan (116 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1954 Citroen Traction. (77 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1954 Citroen Traction. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Citroen Traction weights approximately 550 kg more than 1968 Lotus Elan.
Because 1968 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Citroen Traction, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Citroen Traction | 1968 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Citroen | Lotus |
Model | Traction | Elan |
Year Released | 1954 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2866 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 77 HP | 116 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 82.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 72.8 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1200 mm |