1954 Citroen Traction vs. 1981 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1981 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Citroen Traction. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Citroen Traction would be higher. At 2,866 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Citroen Traction is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Mazda Cosmo (102 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1954 Citroen Traction. (77 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1954 Citroen Traction. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Citroen Traction weights approximately 302 kg more than 1981 Mazda Cosmo.
Because 1981 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Citroen Traction, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Citroen Traction | 1981 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Citroen | Mazda |
| Model | Traction | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2866 cc | 1970 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 77 HP | 102 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 98 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1098 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1420 mm |
