1954 Citroen Traction vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Citroen Traction. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Citroen Traction would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 280 more horse power than 1954 Citroen Traction. (77 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1954 Citroen Traction.
Because 2010 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Citroen Traction, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Citroen Traction | 2010 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Citroen | Holden |
| Model | Traction | UTE |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2866 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 77 HP | 357 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
