1954 DKW Coupe vs. 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace
To start off, 1954 DKW Coupe is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace would be higher. At 1,220 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace (72 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1954 DKW Coupe. (34 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace should accelerate faster than 1954 DKW Coupe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 DKW Coupe weights approximately 459 kg more than 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace.
Because 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 DKW Coupe, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 DKW Coupe | 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace | |
| Make | DKW | Simca |
| Model | Coupe | Type 11 Monoplace |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1949 |
| Engine Size | 903 cc | 1220 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 72 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 879 kg | 420 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 3130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2250 mm |
