1954 DKW F 89 vs. 1968 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1968 Mercury Cougar is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 5,769 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mercury Cougar (194 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 1954 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1954 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 740 kg more than 1954 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 DKW F 89 | 1968 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | DKW | Mercury |
Model | F 89 | Cougar |
Year Released | 1954 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 684 cc | 5769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 194 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2830 mm |