1954 DKW F 89 vs. 1980 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1980 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1954 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1954 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 230 kg more than 1954 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 DKW F 89 | 1980 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | DKW | Mazda |
Model | F 89 | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1954 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 684 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 1090 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2520 mm |