1954 DKW F 89 vs. 2000 Ford Puma
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 1,679 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Puma (153 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1954 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1954 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Puma weights approximately 365 kg more than 1954 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 DKW F 89 | 2000 Ford Puma | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | F 89 | Puma |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 682 cc | 1679 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1275 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1780 mm |
