1954 DKW F 89 vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 682 cc (2 cylinders), 1954 DKW F 89 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 46 more horse power than 1954 DKW F 89. (24 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1954 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 DKW F 89 weights approximately 170 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Because 2002 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 DKW F 89 | 2002 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | DKW | MCC |
| Model | F 89 | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 682 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 70 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1630 mm |
