1954 DKW F 89 vs. 2005 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 684 cc (2 cylinders), 1954 DKW F 89 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 46 more horse power than 1954 DKW F 89. (24 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1954 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 DKW F 89 weights approximately 116 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Because 2005 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 DKW F 89 | 2005 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | DKW | MCC |
| Model | F 89 | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 684 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 70 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 744 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 1810 mm |
