1954 DKW F 89 vs. 2009 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 2009 Dodge Challenger is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Challenger (247 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 223 more horse power than 1954 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1954 DKW F 89.
Because 2009 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Dodge Challenger has automatic transmission and 1954 DKW F 89 has manual transmission. 1954 DKW F 89 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Dodge Challenger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1954 DKW F 89 | 2009 Dodge Challenger | |
Make | DKW | Dodge |
Model | F 89 | Challenger |
Year Released | 1954 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 684 cc | 3518 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 247 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2950 mm |