1954 DKW F 89 vs. 2009 Ford F-250
To start off, 2009 Ford F-250 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 5,399 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford F-250 (300 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 276 more horse power than 1954 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1954 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford F-250 weights approximately 106 kg more than 1954 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Ford F-250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford F-250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 DKW F 89 | 2009 Ford F-250 | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | F 89 | F-250 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 684 cc | 5399 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 5890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 3610 mm |
