1954 DKW F 89 vs. 2010 Chevrolet HHR
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet HHR (155 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1954 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1954 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet HHR weights approximately 571 kg more than 1954 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 DKW F 89 | 2010 Chevrolet HHR | |
Make | DKW | Chevrolet |
Model | F 89 | HHR |
Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 684 cc | 2200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 1431 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4475 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1603 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2629 mm |