1954 DKW Munga vs. 2000 Ford Puma
To start off, 2000 Ford Puma is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,679 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Ford Puma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Puma (153 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1954 DKW Munga. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1954 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 DKW Munga weights approximately 5 kg more than 2000 Ford Puma.
Because 1954 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford Puma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Puma (170 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 DKW Munga. (71 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 DKW Munga.
Compare all specifications:
1954 DKW Munga | 2000 Ford Puma | |
Make | DKW | Ford |
Model | Munga | Puma |
Year Released | 1954 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 896 cc | 1679 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 71 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 71 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 83.5 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1275 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2450 mm |