1954 DKW Munga vs. 2002 MCC Smart
To start off, 2002 MCC Smart is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 DKW Munga would be higher. At 896 cc (3 cylinders), 1954 DKW Munga is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 MCC Smart (80 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1954 DKW Munga. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1954 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 DKW Munga weights approximately 490 kg more than 2002 MCC Smart.
Because 1954 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 MCC Smart. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 MCC Smart (110 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 DKW Munga. (71 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 MCC Smart will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 DKW Munga.
Compare all specifications:
1954 DKW Munga | 2002 MCC Smart | |
Make | DKW | MCC |
Model | Munga | Smart |
Year Released | 1954 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 896 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 80 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 71 Nm | 110 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 71 mm | 66.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 67 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 3430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2370 mm |