1954 DKW Universal vs. 1950 Holden FX
To start off, 1954 DKW Universal is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Holden FX weights approximately 45 kg more than 1954 DKW Universal.
Because 1950 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 DKW Universal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 DKW Universal | 1950 Holden FX | |
Make | DKW | Holden |
Model | Universal | FX |
Year Released | 1954 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 896 cc | 2165 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 51 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2620 mm |