1954 DKW Universal vs. 2003 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2003 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 DKW Universal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 DKW Universal would be higher. At 2,604 cc (5 cylinders), 2003 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 905 kg more than 1954 DKW Universal.
Because 2003 Mercedes-Benz E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Mercedes-Benz E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 DKW Universal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Mercedes-Benz E has automatic transmission and 1954 DKW Universal has manual transmission. 1954 DKW Universal will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Mercedes-Benz E will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 DKW Universal | 2003 Mercedes-Benz E | |
| Make | DKW | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Universal | E |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 896 cc | 2604 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 174 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 1830 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2860 mm |
