1954 DKW Universal vs. 2009 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 DKW Universal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 DKW Universal would be higher. At 2,148 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 1905 kg more than 1954 DKW Universal.
Because 2009 Mercedes-Benz E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Mercedes-Benz E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 DKW Universal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Mercedes-Benz E has automatic transmission and 1954 DKW Universal has manual transmission. 1954 DKW Universal will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mercedes-Benz E will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 DKW Universal | 2009 Mercedes-Benz E | |
| Make | DKW | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Universal | E |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 896 cc | 2148 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 168 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 2830 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1520 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2860 mm |
