1954 DKW Universal vs. 2010 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac STS is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 DKW Universal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 DKW Universal would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac STS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac STS weights approximately 877 kg more than 1954 DKW Universal.
Because 2010 Cadillac STS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Cadillac STS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 DKW Universal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Cadillac STS has automatic transmission and 1954 DKW Universal has manual transmission. 1954 DKW Universal will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Cadillac STS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 DKW Universal | 2010 Cadillac STS | |
| Make | DKW | Cadillac |
| Model | Universal | STS |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 896 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 302 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 1802 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1844 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1463 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2957 mm |
