1954 Ferrari 250 vs. 2000 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2000 Ford Mustang is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ferrari 250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ferrari 250 would be higher. At 4,603 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Mustang (260 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1954 Ferrari 250. (217 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1954 Ferrari 250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Mustang weights approximately 300 kg more than 1954 Ferrari 250. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Ferrari 250 | 2000 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Ferrari | Ford |
| Model | 250 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2963 cc | 4603 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 260 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2580 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 140 L | 59 L |
