1954 Ferrari 625 F1 vs. 2010 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2010 Jeep Compass is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ferrari 625 F1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ferrari 625 F1 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Ferrari 625 F1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Ferrari 625 F1 (247 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 2010 Jeep Compass. (172 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Ferrari 625 F1 should accelerate faster than 2010 Jeep Compass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jeep Compass weights approximately 828 kg more than 1954 Ferrari 625 F1.
Because 1954 Ferrari 625 F1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Ferrari 625 F1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Compass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Ferrari 625 F1 | 2010 Jeep Compass | |
| Make | Ferrari | Jeep |
| Model | 625 F1 | Compass |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2498 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 247 HP | 172 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 600 kg | 1428 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4404 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1030 mm | 1656 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2170 mm | 2634 mm |
