1954 Fiat 1400 vs. 2004 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2004 MCC Crossblade is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Fiat 1400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Fiat 1400 would be higher. At 1,901 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Fiat 1400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 31 more horse power than 1954 Fiat 1400. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1954 Fiat 1400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Fiat 1400 weights approximately 445 kg more than 2004 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Fiat 1400 (134 Nm) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm). This means 1954 Fiat 1400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Fiat 1400 | 2004 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Fiat | MCC |
| Model | 1400 | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 1901 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 39 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 134 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 1810 mm |
