1954 Fiat 500 vs. 1966 Ford 12 M
To start off, 1966 Ford 12 M is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Fiat 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Fiat 500 would be higher. At 1,699 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Ford 12 M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford 12 M (70 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1954 Fiat 500. (16 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford 12 M should accelerate faster than 1954 Fiat 500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Ford 12 M weights approximately 285 kg more than 1954 Fiat 500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Fiat 500 | 1966 Ford 12 M | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | 500 | 12 M |
Year Released | 1954 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 568 cc | 1699 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 16 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 895 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3250 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1290 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 68 L |