1954 Fiat 500 vs. 2000 MCC ForTwo
To start off, 2000 MCC ForTwo is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Fiat 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Fiat 500 would be higher. At 799 cc (3 cylinders), 2000 MCC ForTwo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 MCC ForTwo (40 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1954 Fiat 500. (16 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 MCC ForTwo should accelerate faster than 1954 Fiat 500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 MCC ForTwo weights approximately 120 kg more than 1954 Fiat 500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Fiat 500 | 2000 MCC ForTwo | |
| Make | Fiat | MCC |
| Model | 500 | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Rear | Rear |
| Engine Size | 568 cc | 799 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 16 HP | 40 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 730 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3250 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1290 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 1810 mm |
