1954 Fiat Campagnola vs. 1968 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 1968 Ford Fairlane is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 2,782 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1954 Fiat Campagnola. (52 HP @ 3700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1954 Fiat Campagnola. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 60 kg more than 1954 Fiat Campagnola. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Fiat Campagnola | 1968 Ford Fairlane | |
| Make | Fiat | Ford |
| Model | Campagnola | Fairlane |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1901 cc | 2782 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 52 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1310 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3650 mm | 5110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2960 mm |
