1954 Fiat Campagnola vs. 1982 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1982 Ford Mustang is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Ford Mustang (225 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 1954 Fiat Campagnola. (52 HP @ 3700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1954 Fiat Campagnola. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Ford Mustang weights approximately 233 kg more than 1954 Fiat Campagnola. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Fiat Campagnola | 1982 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Campagnola | Mustang |
Year Released | 1954 | 1982 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1901 cc | 4942 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 52 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 3700 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1483 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3650 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2560 mm |