1954 Fiat Campagnola vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 1998 Renault Clio is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 1,901 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Fiat Campagnola is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Renault Clio (64 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1954 Fiat Campagnola. (52 HP @ 3700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1954 Fiat Campagnola. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Fiat Campagnola weights approximately 370 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio.
Because 1954 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Fiat Campagnola | 1998 Renault Clio | |
Make | Fiat | Renault |
Model | Campagnola | Clio |
Year Released | 1954 | 1998 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1901 cc | 1783 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 52 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 3700 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3650 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2470 mm |