1954 Fiat Campagnola vs. 2002 Ford Ka
To start off, 2002 Ford Ka is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Fiat Campagnola is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Ka (135 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1954 Fiat Campagnola. (38 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1954 Fiat Campagnola.
Because 1954 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Ford Ka. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Ka (175 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Fiat Campagnola. (134 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Fiat Campagnola.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Fiat Campagnola | 2002 Ford Ka | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Campagnola | Ka |
Year Released | 1954 | 2002 |
Body Type | SUV | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 135 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 134 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 82.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 75.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 6.7:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3650 mm | 3660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2450 mm |