1954 Fiat Campagnola vs. 2002 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (141 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1954 Fiat Campagnola. (38 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1954 Fiat Campagnola.
Because 1954 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Fiat Campagnola. (134 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Fiat Campagnola.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Fiat Campagnola | 2002 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Fiat | Jeep |
| Model | Campagnola | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2002 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 3960 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 141 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 134 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3650 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2380 mm |
