1954 Fiat Campagnola vs. 2006 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2006 Toyota Tundra is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Tundra (236 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 184 more horse power than 1954 Fiat Campagnola. (52 HP @ 3700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1954 Fiat Campagnola. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 105 kg more than 1954 Fiat Campagnola. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Fiat Campagnola | 2006 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Fiat | Toyota |
Model | Campagnola | Tundra |
Year Released | 1954 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1901 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 52 HP | 236 HP |
Engine RPM | 3700 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3650 mm | 5550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 3270 mm |