1954 Fiat V8 vs. 2003 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2003 MCC Crossblade is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Fiat V8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Fiat V8 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Fiat V8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Fiat V8 (104 HP) has 34 more horse power than 2003 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Fiat V8 should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Fiat V8 weights approximately 400 kg more than 2003 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Fiat V8 | 2003 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Fiat | MCC |
| Model | V8 | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 70 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 1810 mm |
