1954 Ford 12 M vs. 1959 Saab 95
To start off, 1959 Saab 95 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,172 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Ford 12 M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 37 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Because 1954 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 Saab 95, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Ford 12 M | 1959 Saab 95 | |
Make | Ford | Saab |
Model | 12 M | 95 |
Year Released | 1954 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 841 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1480 mm |