1954 Ford 12 M vs. 1963 Holden EJ
To start off, 1963 Holden EJ is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Holden EJ (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1954 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Holden EJ should accelerate faster than 1954 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Ford 12 M | 1963 Holden EJ | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | 12 M | EJ |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 2262 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1480 mm |
