1954 Ford 12 M vs. 1977 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1977 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1977 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1954 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1977 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1954 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Ford 12 M | 1977 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | 12 M | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1954 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2520 mm |