1954 Ford 12 M vs. 1982 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1982 Suzuki Fronte is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,172 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Ford 12 M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Ford 12 M (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1982 Suzuki Fronte. (29 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1954 Ford 12 M should accelerate faster than 1982 Suzuki Fronte.
Because 1954 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Suzuki Fronte, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Ford 12 M | 1982 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Ford | Suzuki |
Model | 12 M | Fronte |
Year Released | 1954 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 543 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 29 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2160 mm |