1954 Ford 12 M vs. 1983 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1983 Toyota Celica is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Toyota Celica (106 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1954 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1954 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Ford 12 M | 1983 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | 12 M | Celica |
| Year Released | 1954 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1588 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1330 mm |
