1954 Ford 12 M vs. 1992 Renault 19
To start off, 1992 Renault 19 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Renault 19 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Renault 19 (110 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1954 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Renault 19 should accelerate faster than 1954 Ford 12 M.
Because 1954 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Renault 19, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Ford 12 M | 1992 Renault 19 | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | 12 M | 19 |
Year Released | 1954 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2550 mm |