1954 Ford 12 M vs. 1992 Rover 216
To start off, 1992 Rover 216 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Rover 216 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Rover 216 (122 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1954 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Rover 216 should accelerate faster than 1954 Ford 12 M.
Because 1954 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Rover 216, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Ford 12 M | 1992 Rover 216 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | 12 M | 216 |
Year Released | 1954 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1380 mm |