1954 Ford 12 M vs. 1996 Lancia Kappa
To start off, 1996 Lancia Kappa is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,451 cc (5 cylinders), 1996 Lancia Kappa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Lancia Kappa (173 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1954 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Lancia Kappa should accelerate faster than 1954 Ford 12 M.
Because 1954 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Lancia Kappa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Ford 12 M | 1996 Lancia Kappa | |
Make | Ford | Lancia |
Model | 12 M | Kappa |
Year Released | 1954 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 2451 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2710 mm |