1954 Ford 12 M vs. 1996 Proton 400
To start off, 1996 Proton 400 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Proton 400 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1954 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Proton 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Proton 400 has automatic transmission and 1954 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1954 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Proton 400 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Ford 12 M | 1996 Proton 400 | |
Make | Ford | Proton |
Model | 12 M | 400 |
Year Released | 1954 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1390 mm |