1954 Ford 12 M vs. 1998 Mitsubishi Space Star
To start off, 1998 Mitsubishi Space Star is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,834 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Mitsubishi Space Star is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mitsubishi Space Star (120 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1954 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mitsubishi Space Star should accelerate faster than 1954 Ford 12 M.
Because 1954 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Mitsubishi Space Star, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Ford 12 M | 1998 Mitsubishi Space Star | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | 12 M | Space Star |
Year Released | 1954 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1570 mm |