1954 Ford 12 M vs. 1999 Mazda B2500
To start off, 1999 Mazda B2500 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Mazda B2500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mazda B2500 (82 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1954 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mazda B2500 should accelerate faster than 1954 Ford 12 M.
Because 1999 Mazda B2500 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mazda B2500 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Ford 12 M | 1999 Mazda B2500 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | 12 M | B2500 |
Year Released | 1954 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 82 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2990 mm |