1954 Ford 12 M vs. 1999 Mitsubishi SUW
To start off, 1999 Mitsubishi SUW is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,172 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Ford 12 M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mitsubishi SUW (114 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1954 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi SUW should accelerate faster than 1954 Ford 12 M.
Because 1954 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi SUW, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1999 Mitsubishi SUW has automatic transmission and 1954 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1954 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Mitsubishi SUW will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Ford 12 M | 1999 Mitsubishi SUW | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | 12 M | SUW |
Year Released | 1954 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1099 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2630 mm |