1954 Ford 12 M vs. 2000 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2000 Ford Taurus is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,933 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Taurus (156 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1954 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1954 Ford 12 M.
Because 1954 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Ford Taurus has automatic transmission and 1954 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1954 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Taurus will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Ford 12 M | 2000 Ford Taurus | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | 12 M | Taurus |
Year Released | 1954 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 2933 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2760 mm |