1954 Ford 12 M vs. 2000 GMC Yukon
To start off, 2000 GMC Yukon is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 5,326 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 GMC Yukon (269 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 232 more horse power than 1954 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 1954 Ford 12 M.
Because 2000 GMC Yukon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 GMC Yukon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 GMC Yukon has automatic transmission and 1954 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1954 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 GMC Yukon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Ford 12 M | 2000 GMC Yukon | |
| Make | Ford | GMC |
| Model | 12 M | Yukon |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 5326 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 269 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1890 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2950 mm |
