1954 Ford 12 M vs. 2000 Suzuki XL6
To start off, 2000 Suzuki XL6 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,501 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Suzuki XL6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Suzuki XL6 (70 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1954 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Suzuki XL6 should accelerate faster than 1954 Ford 12 M.
Because 2000 Suzuki XL6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Suzuki XL6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Suzuki XL6 has automatic transmission and 1954 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1954 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Suzuki XL6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1954 Ford 12 M | 2000 Suzuki XL6 | |
| Make | Ford | Suzuki |
| Model | 12 M | XL6 |
| Year Released | 1954 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 2501 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4190 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2490 mm |
