1954 Ford 12 M vs. 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK
To start off, 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK (94 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1954 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1954 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK has automatic transmission and 1954 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1954 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Ford 12 M | 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK | |
Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 12 M | CLK |
Year Released | 1954 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2720 mm |