1954 Ford 12 M vs. 2002 Hyundai XG
To start off, 2002 Hyundai XG is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Hyundai XG is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Hyundai XG (161 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1954 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Hyundai XG should accelerate faster than 1954 Ford 12 M.
Because 1954 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Hyundai XG, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Hyundai XG has automatic transmission and 1954 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1954 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Hyundai XG will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Ford 12 M | 2002 Hyundai XG | |
Make | Ford | Hyundai |
Model | 12 M | XG |
Year Released | 1954 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 2491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2760 mm |