1954 Ford 12 M vs. 2002 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2002 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Nissan X-Trail (112 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1954 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1954 Ford 12 M.
Because 2002 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Ford 12 M | 2002 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | 12 M | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1954 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 2184 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 112 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2540 mm |