1954 Ford 12 M vs. 2002 Renault Kangoo
To start off, 2002 Renault Kangoo is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Renault Kangoo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Renault Kangoo (97 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1954 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Renault Kangoo should accelerate faster than 1954 Ford 12 M.
Because 2002 Renault Kangoo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Renault Kangoo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Ford 12 M | 2002 Renault Kangoo | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | 12 M | Kangoo |
Year Released | 1954 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1910 mm |