1954 Ford 12 M vs. 2003 Ford Econovan
To start off, 2003 Ford Econovan is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,789 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Econovan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Econovan (90 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1954 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Econovan should accelerate faster than 1954 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1954 Ford 12 M | 2003 Ford Econovan | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | 12 M | Econovan |
Year Released | 1954 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1870 mm |